I'm having Victorian fireplaces installed into the living room and two main bedrooms of my London flat. Currently we have chimney breasts with square empty holes, which looks a bit odd and I'm excited to get the building back to somethings like its original state.
I would never use the fires in the bedrooms and am content with them being decorative, but am disagreeing with DP about the living room fire. The installers say that it would cost no more money to make the fireplace technically functional, and as far as I understand it the way the old fireplaces are constructed means that you wouldn't get crap falling through unless you open it up manually?
I like that an open fire gives you some resilience against power cuts, and also think future buyers might prefer the option to use it.
DP is firmly against having it functional as he doesn't ever want to use the fireplace for a fire. In reality we probably never would but... is there a downside to making it technically possible?
Fireplace people seem (understandably) very passionate about open fires so would like some neutral views if possible!