We are in the early stages of planning an extension & remodel and trying to understand what we can do in terms of opening it up Vs avoiding cost where possible.
The back of the house is about 7m and we are adding a 3x7m extension onto that. it currently has 2m patio doors and a normal door in that wall.
Clearly if we leave the openings as they are it will save a lot of money compared to opening it up across the whole width which would give us so much more scope for great plans, but may be really expensive. What we really don't know is whether it would cost less to open it up but leave space for a structural column, or two columns, or a bit of wall, or only open the current 2m opening by another metre.
Does anyone have an idea how much difference the size of the opening makes once you start knocking out structural walls? I guess I'm thinking if you pay £5k to open the 2m to 3m but it's only £7k to have the whole lot removed then I'd maybe rather pay the £7k, or at least keep it as an option if it would really improve plans.
And as it stands with the various plans we have it'd be really easy to work in a column somewhere in the middle so does that save much money?