I am currently in month 9 of a 12 month rental contract (via letting agent) with no break clause, and with two months notice to end at 12m and beyond. I am keen to move out early, and so negotiated an exit in month 11 with the letting agents- and it turns out that the landlord now wishes to sell asap, hence why he agreed.
On finding this out, I did ask the agents whether we could negotiate a months notice instead, given his desire to sell and market the house quickly, and our preference for a shorter notice period, but “by any standards this [letting you leave the contract a month early] is very generous, saving you £x but which the Landlord has agreed to lose”.
Fine. Understand that we are in a contract and they don’t have to accommodate early exit requests. However, we have two anxious dogs, children, WFH for the majority (but even if we are not here, our dogs are) with unpredictable schedules and shifts, have packing boxes everywhere, and accommodating viewings will be tricky during the next six weeks and definitely not during the working week or alternate Saturdays (have to do fortnightly sat shifts atm). There were no conditions attached to the early exit.
I explained this to the LA, and suggested that viewings and marketing might wait until late Feb - until the last few weeks of our tenancy, but he came back with this (&then threatened to rescind the early exit agreement) : Are you essentially refusing to allow reasonable viewing requests on the property and by definition thwarting any sale and financial benefit the Landlord would enjoy
He then went onto say that under the contract viewing clause, we had a legal obligation to allow viewings with 24hrs notice & that the landlord could take money from our deposit for compensation (if we thwart sale and financial benefit) or sue us for compensation if we did not allow viewings, and in light of the early exit agreement where the LL is “losing” £.
my rusty remembering of land law (with a quick two decades refresh on google) are that despite the viewings clause,
- quiet enjoyment trumps and therefore we do not have to allow any viewings that aren’t reasonable for us, as infrequent as this may be - or indeed any viewings (I know this is a whole debate in itself as to the right/wrong of this) -but is that right just from a technical perspective ?
- But I’m really unclear about the deposit point and the thwarting of financial benefit and sale to LL if anyone can advise..? I am pretty sure that the early exit agreement has no bearing on anything.. and also pretty sure I don’t owe the LL any support for gaining financial benefit whilst I am still a tenant? can the LL deduct deposit money/ what constitutes “thwarting financial benefit”?
- (particularly if i can prove that I am being reasonable in not being able to accommodate viewings that don’t work with my schedule?)
sorry it’s so long and thanks!