Trying to work out at what point it's more cost effective to replace a kitchen completely vs. just replace certain parts.
Our situation: 2 bed flat in city centre. Been living here for 1 year, previous owners were here 10+ years and fitted this kitchen as new. This is our first home, and our intention is to be here for minimum 5 more years, before buying somewhere bigger. Currently no DC, but plan to have our first while we're still living here. Ideally we will then keep this flat and let it out.
We want to change elements of the kitchen, but not all:
Things we definitely need to replace:
- Electric hob and extractor fan (broken)
- Floor tiles (broken)
Things we'd like to replace:
- Cabinet doors (dislike style)
- Worktops (warped and water damaged in places)
- Add tiles to walls (currently just a plain painted wall apart from a stainless steel splashback)
Things that we are happy to keep:
- Kitchen layout (galley, can't change much
- Structure of the cabinets (they feel solid)
- All other appliances (new or only a few years old, fitted into current cabinetry)
I've read a bit online about just refacing cabinets and worktops, so I'm wondering if doing that + the appliances and floor is an option, but given we plan to be here for a while and want to let the flat out in future I'm wondering if it would make sense to start afresh, to maximise the time we get to benefit from it and ensure it's at a high enough spec to let out. (The rest of the flat is to a good spec already, it's just the kitchen that is currently letting it down.)
Maximum budget is around £12k
Have never done any sort of kitchen refurb before, no DIY skills.
Should we start from scratch or update what we've got?
Any advice welcome please!