What a wonderful friend you are OP. Very pleased you are setting some boundaries and taking time to look after yourself.
I can see lots of options have been suggested which your friend is following up. My advice is that he should press heavily on the local authority’s housing needs team.
Section 21 notice
Once a valid section 21 notice is served that expires within 56 days, the local authority must treat the person as ‘threatened with homelessness’ (see section 175(5) of the Housing Act 1996), and in consequence, it becomes subject to the prevention duty (set out in section 195). This is an ongoing duty to try and prevent the person from becoming homeless. That might mean liaising with a landlord for more time at the existing property (but only if it is suitable to occupy and that is an option) or helping them find another property.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/52/section/175
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/52/section/195
It is not correct that the local authority can wait until a bailiff is on the door before expecting a person to leave, or that they will consider someone leaving before that point as intentionally homeless. This is made clear in the homelessness code of guidance which I will link below. However, they will look at each case and take a view as to how long a person can be expected to stay. I cannot see how your friend can be expected to stay beyond the notice period as it sounds like the inspection has determined the property is unsuitable for habitation/unsafe. If that is the case, it is not reasonable to occupy now let alone beyond the section 21 expiry date. A person is considered homeless if they have accommodation that it is not reasonable to expect them to occupy (see section 175(3) in the earlier link). So you friend may be able to say he is homeless now and not just threatened with homelessness on [date the section 21 notice expires].
Here is a link to the homelessness code of guidance. It is rather lengthy but it sets out the legal framework so is super helpful
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5ef9d8613a6f4023cf12fc67/Current_Homelessness_Code_of_Guidance.pdf
The local authority duty to house
When a person presents as homeless, if they are in apparent priority need, the local authority must provide interim accommodation (per section 188), whilst it considers whether it owes the person the main housing duty under section 193. The main housing duty is a duty to find/provide settled accommodation. This can be discharged by finding a private let for a minimum term of 12 months, or a social housing allocation (in the council’s own stock if it has any or housing association accommodation). In a nutshell, to be owed the main housing duty the only additional criteria, is that the person must not be intentionally homeless. The local authority might also wish to secure further information as to whether the person does have a priority need (at the interim stage the test is that the person 'may have a priority need’ i.e. a lower threshold). Your friend will not be considered intentionally homeless if he has received a section 21 notice. As discussed earlier, he will also not be considered intentionally homeless for not waiting for the bailiff to show up. Moreover, he might be homeless due to the condition of his present property.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/52/section/188
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/52/section/193
Priority need
It sounds to me as though your friend might have a priority need. It seems he has some rigid thinking, awkwardness, is very routinised and not very social (you are this only friend), so he may well be neurodiverse. He also has scoliosis, and mental health problems. At the very least I cannot see how a local authority could not find that he ‘may’ have a priority need and therefore it owe him a duty to house him temporarily under the section 188 interim duty. The priority needs group are set out in code of guidance I have linked above but includes people with health conditions or disabilities, or people vulnerable for special reasons. It is great news that your friend is seeing his GP. I would urge him to get a letter from his GP and explore whether he is neurodiverse (which the GP can note). I appreciate this might be a tricky conversation though and not one you want to have!
Some things to know about disability are:
- A letter from a doctor or specialist is generally needed.
- It is not necessary to have a formal diagnosis by a specialist for some conditions – it is very difficult to get as assessment for autism for example, and there is a long waiting list. In light of that many people have a treating diagnosis for their conditions.
- Also no need to be claiming PIP but that would be helpful as it shows another person has concluded the disability has impact day-to-day.
- The fact he works does not mean he does not have a disability or autism. Please ignore the earlier poster that said it is disgusting to get a diagnosis for housing. That is an ignorant view.
·
Accommodation offer
If the local authority does make an offer of accommodation, that accommodation must be reasonable to occupy. I am glad that the earlier talks of shared accommodation have been put to bed. He would not be expected to share for the purposes of benefits - only those under 30 have a housing allowance set at sharer rates. If your friend can show his need to live alone is due to a disability, the local authority will also have to find him something self-contained. The local authority might also need to take into account the proximity to his work (depending on whether again, this is due to his disability. At the very least, he is undeniably vulnerable and I cannot see how he would not be a priority for sheltered housing. It seems he would benefit from the on-site support.
Having said all this, local authorities are extremely stretched - not enough properties or money to deal with the unprecedented demand. This undoubtedly leads some to not provide as much assistance as they should or applying tests too strictly. For that reason I would recommend your friend makes sure he is fully informed of his rights, and takes someone with him to help advocate for him, if possible.
I hope this helps.