Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Property/DIY

Join our Property forum for renovation, DIY, and house selling advice.

Engineered wood or LVT?

57 replies

arabellaL · 05/11/2023 09:29

I know I know, this has been discussed to death but I need a final canvassing of opinions.

Need to screed and lay floor on a large hallway and open plan kitchen/diner (we'll carpet the living room) but can't decide between engineered wood and LVT.

Prefer the look of real wood but don't love the idea of having to reoil such a huge area and it scratching more easily.

LVT feels more soulless to me but the warmth of it appeals as we're not going for underfloor heating and the fact it's virtually maintenance free.

Is there actually any LVT that is both affordable and looks like real wood?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
arabellaL · 15/11/2023 23:22

Will check out the laminate!

Attempt two for the waterproof engineered wood link www.luxuryflooringandfurnishings.co.uk/waterproof-quayside-oak.html

OP posts:
arabellaL · 15/11/2023 23:23

arabellaL · 15/11/2023 23:22

Will check out the laminate!

Attempt two for the waterproof engineered wood link www.luxuryflooringandfurnishings.co.uk/waterproof-quayside-oak.html

Damn no idea why it's not working! www.luxuryflooringandfurnishings.co.uk/waterproof-quayside-oak.html

It's the quayside oak from luxury flooring anyway. I'm sorely tempted if it truly is waterproof

OP posts:
ClematisBlue49 · 16/11/2023 17:43

Further to my comparison of appearance and temperature underfoot yesterday, here is an update on the scratch / spill / stain tests conducted today...

First, the samples I used were (all costs excluding fitting):

EW: V4 Shore Drift Oak with a lacquered finish (about £90psm as I recall; you would need to add the cost of adhesives)

Laminate: Quickstep Water-resistant laminate from the Impressive range in Soft Oak Light (£27.99psm; underlay would add about £8-12psm)

Vinyl: Amtico Hushed Oak with in-built underlay (around £50psm - prices vary considerably according to supplier)

Test 1: Scratching

I attacked all 3 samples with a sharp pointed knife (gouging and scraping). The EW fared worst - a clearly visible scratch mark, although if you appreciate a wood floor with a bit of wear and tear, it might be acceptable. Scratches were also visible on the vinyl, especially at certain angles, although you'd have to look very hard. The laminate (to my surprise) showed no damage whatsoever.

Test 2: Spillage

I left pooled water on the samples for about 8 hours. All 3 passed this test. In the case of the EW, the lacquered finish obviously protected it, so presumably it might become less water resistant over time, and other finishes might not perform so well. No surprise that the vinyl was waterproof on the surface, but I did wonder about the foamy underlay, if water were to reach it and not be removed. The laminate appeared to be water resistant throughout, but perhaps, like the EW, it might perform less well after several years in areas that get a lot of wear.

Test 3: Staining

I left frozen blueberries on the samples, again for about 8 hours and wiped up with a wet kitchen towel. I chose this test because I find the juice from these to be the hardest stain to get out of carpet, and I use a lot of them. The vinyl and laminate both showed no staining whatsoever. There was a very slight stain on the EW, which I could not remove, but again, the lacquer must have done a decent job. On a darker shade, it probably wouldn't be noticeable.

Conclusion...

I was really surprised and impressed by the laminate. As I think it looks as good as the EW, while being cheaper and performing better, it's a clear decision for me, and I'm warming to the idea of having rugs for the living room and bedrooms rather than carpet in order to achieve seamless transitions between rooms. Currently I'm deciding between the Soft Oak Medium and Soft Oak Light. Both are lovely and have a subtle matt finish, similar to the EW.

CellophaneFlower · 16/11/2023 20:24

I ordered a load of laminate and engineered wood samples a while back. I was surprised that some of the laminate actually looked more authentic than the wood! It was definitely harder to scratch the laminate, but it looked more noticeable when I finally did.

LindaDawn · 16/11/2023 21:30

ClematisBlue49 · 16/11/2023 17:43

Further to my comparison of appearance and temperature underfoot yesterday, here is an update on the scratch / spill / stain tests conducted today...

First, the samples I used were (all costs excluding fitting):

EW: V4 Shore Drift Oak with a lacquered finish (about £90psm as I recall; you would need to add the cost of adhesives)

Laminate: Quickstep Water-resistant laminate from the Impressive range in Soft Oak Light (£27.99psm; underlay would add about £8-12psm)

Vinyl: Amtico Hushed Oak with in-built underlay (around £50psm - prices vary considerably according to supplier)

Test 1: Scratching

I attacked all 3 samples with a sharp pointed knife (gouging and scraping). The EW fared worst - a clearly visible scratch mark, although if you appreciate a wood floor with a bit of wear and tear, it might be acceptable. Scratches were also visible on the vinyl, especially at certain angles, although you'd have to look very hard. The laminate (to my surprise) showed no damage whatsoever.

Test 2: Spillage

I left pooled water on the samples for about 8 hours. All 3 passed this test. In the case of the EW, the lacquered finish obviously protected it, so presumably it might become less water resistant over time, and other finishes might not perform so well. No surprise that the vinyl was waterproof on the surface, but I did wonder about the foamy underlay, if water were to reach it and not be removed. The laminate appeared to be water resistant throughout, but perhaps, like the EW, it might perform less well after several years in areas that get a lot of wear.

Test 3: Staining

I left frozen blueberries on the samples, again for about 8 hours and wiped up with a wet kitchen towel. I chose this test because I find the juice from these to be the hardest stain to get out of carpet, and I use a lot of them. The vinyl and laminate both showed no staining whatsoever. There was a very slight stain on the EW, which I could not remove, but again, the lacquer must have done a decent job. On a darker shade, it probably wouldn't be noticeable.

Conclusion...

I was really surprised and impressed by the laminate. As I think it looks as good as the EW, while being cheaper and performing better, it's a clear decision for me, and I'm warming to the idea of having rugs for the living room and bedrooms rather than carpet in order to achieve seamless transitions between rooms. Currently I'm deciding between the Soft Oak Medium and Soft Oak Light. Both are lovely and have a subtle matt finish, similar to the EW.

Thank you so much for your comprehensive post. Very grateful. Do you have to have a specialist fitter for the Quick-Step laminate to be laid? I was only ever interested in the glue down LVT (can’t remember exactly why) and the fitted is roughly the cost of the LVT. Do you know the cost of laying the quick step.

App13 · 17/11/2023 08:55

I had porcelain style wooden planks in herringbone laid.. they're absolutely bullet proof when it comes to stains etc .. and look like real oak. I was umming and ahhing for engineering wood but decided with a messy toddler the porcelain would be best

ClematisBlue49 · 17/11/2023 09:44

@LindaDawn , I don't know the fitting cost, I'm afraid. The laminate and vinyl samples I used are both click-fit, not glue-down though. I expect mine to be done by my new builders (I'm between contractors at the moment - long story) and am waiting on quotes. Quickstep has a 'Find an Installer' link on the website, so you might be able to find out that way.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread