I don't have experience of living in any bungalows, but what I would say is this: pull up the EPCs of all of them, look at 'current' and 'potential' ratings. Also look at the year they were created; the older the EPC, the less likely it is to give a higher potential because technologies have changed; a 9 yo epc is far less likely to reflect energy POTENTIAL than a 1 yo one. If you have money to spend, the potential rating is the most important.
To figure out the heating bill, take the KwH stated on the EPC and basically double or even triple it, because most of them are wildly inaccurate. So if it's fully electric with no gas, you'd take say 19,000 kwh per year with 0.33p per KwH for the current electric rate, plus the, what, 50p a day standing charge, add all that up, times it by two. Electric being three or four times more expensive than gas, I'd be very loathe to buy a property that only runs on electric. The Kwh is only for heating and HW btw; doesn't include cooking, washing, tumble drying, etc.
If the home is gas central heated, take your KwH and get the gas rates (I am not on gas, maybe 8p a kwh? check), that should be 3/4's of your bill, and the electric 1/4th. That's around the split homes have that are heated by gas. Remember you also have to add up a separate daily standing charge for gas too, if it has both utilities.
Bear in mind bungalows tend to have lower ceilings than houses thus get a lot less natural light, and because are also prone to damp and need more heat, you should err on the side of caution and overestimate how much you will need to heat it. I remember viewing a rental bungalow on a hot sunny day in May one year, it was really big and absolutely freezing cold.
Again, bungalow disclaimer: 1930s HOUSES are probably hard to retro insulate to an extent (at least the floors and walls), 1970s should be fine, and the build quality from 1990s onwards has frankly been so shoddy that I'd really have to be talked into buying any home from then onwards because the house itself is likely to be shit (poor quality of materials, sound insulation, I'm sure others will come along and fill anything I am missing in).
I'd be tempted to go to 70s over 30s because it's probably slightly cheaper to fix any damp issues due to the forty year age gap, but really, consult with a builder: the construction between the two property types could vary massively.
I hope that makes some sense.