Yup. EPCs are basically smoke and mirrors for the government to be able to say they are looking after the environment, e.g. not allowing landlords to rent out properties with an EpC lower than an E because it would cost too much to heat.
But.. they check NOTHING.
We moved into a house in July last year that had an EPC of E 40, so it was one point above being legal to rent out. The EpC said it would use 26,500 kWh per year. But the EPC guy doesn't check that radiators are working, and they have an online chart to look at the supposed efficiency of boilers, without being made to check said boiler is running at the efficiency their chart said it is.
Guess what happened? We got through that KwH estimate in four months. Actual consumption if we had allowed ourselves the luxury of warmth would have been 100,000 kWh per year, which is absolutely outrageous.
Then the cost of heating oil tripled, and we figured we really didn't fancy spending £1250 a month to heat it during cold winter spells, so we left.
Like I said. Smoke and mirrors. Lots of deceptive people in the industry, poorly paid too. Once they do the journey, inspection and report, they are basically earning minimum wage.
I have seen houses over measured by 40%. I have seen a house which is a set of four walls of a former cow shed with no roof have an EPC of G1, 'with the potential to reach 99.'
Sure, it could reach that if you spend 150k on it and literally had a wind turbine in your back garden. Idiots.
Anyway, if you are worried about the raging because a Green mortgage depends on it, don't worry. They won't check whether anything is working.