We have recently done a second viewing of a house that we love. A year ago the house was on for just over £1m, it only got one offer but that fell through.
They’ve now relisted the house at £950k with a new estate agent who said they last estate agent overvalued it. It is a lovely 5 bed Victorian detached house with high ceilings, but they’ve lived in the house for nearly 15 years and have done absolutely nothing to it (literally nothing) it’s very dated. The kitchen is also very small for a house of that price and size, same with the main bathroom, so you would need to spend money repainting, flooring, carpeting, taking out water tanks, making a bigger bathroom and kitchen (knocking through walls and extension).
We made an offer yesterday of £100k under, giving the reason that with the current interest rates being what they are and potential housing crash we need to be realistic and the house needs a good chunk of money to do it up. I also think for a buyer to basically sit in a house for that long and rely only on inflation to increase the value is a bit much. This is coming from a perspective that the house we have (also Victorian) was also very dated when we bought it and we have renovated it from top to bottom over the last 5 years and you can see as they estate agent said, why our house has jumped up in value.
With all of the above though, do you think it’s very cheeky to make an offer of a £100k under? They have rejected the offer and told the estate agent to not even record our offer. The estate agent also made a cheeky comment about us maybe just not being there yet to buy a house at that price. I took a bit of offence to that considering we’d have a significant deposit and already have a mortgage in principle so know we could afford the asking price and more if need be, but we are trying to be sensible and realistic.