Genuine judgement-free question. Not trying to start a ‘in my day….’ thread.
there are a lot of questions coming up recently about it being a risky time to buy, especially with a lot percentage deposit and needing to move after 2years. Has that not always been the case? Or is there something about ‘now’ that makes it different?
DP and I are in our early thirties. My friends also bought houses in their late twenties up to late thirties. Everyone I know put down at least 10% deposit. They don’t all have glamorous jobs. They picked houses/ locations based on where they could have 10% deposit, which did involve moving out a bit. likewise with rented houses, those who had an aim to buy, rented rooms in house shares while we were making less and need to be near city centre, with the goal of saving 10%, and when salaries went up and they wanted to move away from house shares, moved out of the city (if they could afford it and still reach their saving goals).
I’m one of the last of my friends to buy. I could have bought in my early/ mid-twenties but didn’t because I was told by so many people not to buy unless I intend to stay there for 7 years!