@Xenia ”I think the were suggestions it was going to be 3% a year of the land value in part in place of business rates.”
There is a lot of scaremongering about LVT. In the article you referenced it says ‘3% of 55%’ so effective 1.5%
Maybe to get the ball rolling it could be set to 0.25% and not remove any other taxes, then let it evolve.
Even if someone introduces an LVT, it’s not a garden tax. It is designed to make better use of land. If you own land, you need to pay tax on it. This should incentivize (commercial, not residential) land owners to develop the land, and as land doesn’t move, there is no escaping the tax. It will stop land hoarding.
In any case, taxes are only going one way now, same as interest rates.