We live in a 1930s (I think) semi. When we moved in we were absolutely clueless first time buyers and over the last 5 years have discovered many, many issues with the house that an experienced eye would have noticed and probably would have avoided purchasing.
One of the main issues we have finally gotten around to addressing is the damp course being covered by the pavement at the side of our house. We've had a damp company out and they advised to get the issue rectified by the council will likely take around 6 years or so. Apparently the brick wetness is at 34% and the plaster is very wet at the bottom of the wall in the hallway. He said it is rising damp as the wall higher up is fine. His recommendation is tanking for that area as an injectable damp course is useless because of the high pavement, does this sound right?
We also apparently have rising damp at the back of the house (I've seen mould on the walls at the bottom so believe this), which he said an injectable will deal with.
Does this sound like the correct course of action for anyone who has had a similar issue? I'm reading such conflicting things about injectable damp courses but I think the high pavement makes it more tricky.
For full disclosure in case it is relevant, our rendering is awful and our gutters probably need doing, not sure if this changes any advice! Thanks in advance!
I'll post pics in comments