Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Property/DIY

Join our Property forum for renovation, DIY, and house selling advice.

Stupidly low offer

557 replies

Indablungerlow · 14/12/2022 15:51

Selling house. Only been on the market a week or so. Received an offer of 50 - yes 50k below asking price. Really pissed off someone could be that cheeky. Anyone else received cheeky offers lately?

OP posts:
ScroogeMcDuckling · 23/12/2022 21:30

Mark 19735

i spoke to people on here a few weeks ago about the repossessions that happened in the late 80s/early 90s.

I do not live in the North of England, I lived in North East London where flats/small terraced houses were sold for £60,000/£70,000in the late 80s and in the 90s they were lucky to get £40,000 for them. Unemployment was high, but if you were prepared to clean toilets there were jobs.

When peoples mortgages jump up that it’s nearly your wages on the mortgage, no rates, no food, no electric, no gas, no car, it’s very very real

We didn’t lose our place, we both had two jobs each, and lodgers but a lot of my friends did.

It was ruthlessly quick that the banks had you in court and evicted.

I hope and pray that next year is not like the early 90s, I really do, because it was fucking awful.

JassyRadlett · 23/12/2022 21:44

Grumpyoldpersonwithcats · 23/12/2022 18:42

75000 in 1991,
8200 in 2004,
49000 in 2008
7000 in 2016

Well it looks like a cyclic model to me but feel free to completely ignore the numbers in the middle in order to present a completely fallacious conclusion.

Well, no.

A peak that's 50% higher than the next outlier isn't indicative of something 'cyclical' even if the overall number of mortgages were static. It would be a sign that repossessions were significantly higher in one downturn than in the subsequent one.

These are of course linked to the recessions and housing market impacts of same - so no more cyclical than the recessions themselves.

In fact, source data shows that there were nearly 2 million more mortgages in 2008 than in 1991. So not only was the 1991 figure significantly higher, it's also against a smaller number of overall mortgages. It is, in fact, markedly different.

There were a lot of interventions in 2008 to prevent repossessions on the scale of the 90s recession.

AreOttersJustWetCats · 23/12/2022 22:14

One key difference is the way interest rates plummeted in 2008. Provided you kept your job, nobody found themselves suddenly having to make significantly higher mortgage payments than they'd expected/budgeted for.

Pipsquiggle · 23/12/2022 22:54

I am kind of hoping @Indablungerlow comes back and tells us that she got a great offer for her house and we all got it wrong.

OP - sorry your thread has got totally derailed. Hope you get what you need to move onto your next home.

Happy Christmas everyone!

Nat6999 · 24/12/2022 01:35

A first offer is just that, you turn it down & wait to see if they increase the offer.

sst1234 · 26/12/2022 16:36

Indablungerlow · 14/12/2022 16:01

The buyer's were on combined income of over 200k don't tell me they couldn't afford increased interest rates

That’s not how house buying works. How much a house is worth is not dependent on a viewer’s salary. They could be earning £2 million, that doesn’t mean they have to offer a certain amount.

Are you sure you are up to the highs and lows of buying and selling?

DeadHouseBounce · 26/12/2022 19:06

Maximinimalist · 23/12/2022 15:48

Who is plumplot? Is it reputable? Why not just use ONS data directly on its own?

www.plumplot.co.uk/

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread