My partner and I are buying our first house together. We offered £288k with the understanding we’d borrow £244k (LTV of 85%).
The bank undervalued the property at £280k but still offered us a mortgage of £244k. The broker emailed saying this did not affect our product range and the lender was still happy to lend us the full amount we’d asked for.
They also sent us the illustration, as a PDF with offer in the title, which says the loan granted is £244k on a property valued at £280k, and a letter saying our mortgage had been accepted. Importantly the figure in the illustration places us at 87% LTV after the undervaluation (with the last 8k being made up by us) but would have been 85% of our original offer.
Unfortunately our survey flagged the property needs a rewire and new roof. We negotiated to £275k, asked the broker to inform the lender and asked for advice on if we could keep the same loan amount or adjust it to reflect the £5k reduction below their valuation,
The broker has come back and said we have an 85% LTV deal so this can’t be done. We pushed back on this saying we already had an 87% LTV offer and they checked with the lender who confirmed it was an 85% maximum LTV deal.
We pointed out the paperwork doesn’t reflect this but the mortgage broker has brushed it off the lender’s paperwork being unclear. I don’t think that’s true - surely the offer should have told us how much we were actually being lent instead of a different figure? Is this normal when getting a mortgage?
We think maybe there was an error on the offer and they put in the old figure for the £288k instead of an adjusted figure based on the £280k valuation. is that even possible?
Have we made a really obvious mistake because we don’t get mortgages or is the paperwork wrong? If it is the paperwork should our broker have spotted it?