I think the wall may have been drylined on the bedroom side. that would add a few inches of thickness and it would sound hollow. Possibly if the wall was previously an extrtnal one and was rough. this would explain why the surface is not visibly damp on that side, even though the brick wall behind it might be.
As the damp wall is an internal one, the damp is not likely tp be rain related, but quite likely due to leakage.
Let's suppose there is an old concrete floor which was covered up by a previous owner. they might havre done that to conceal damp. unable to evaporate off, and if the house was built before dpcs became compulsory (about 1875 in london but may be later elsewhere) then damp could rise up the wall up to the height where the rate of evaporation equalled the rate of absorbsion. It's possible there will be a dry-looking line near the floor if a damp-hiding treatment has been used.
to test this, you really ought to lift the flooring and look behind it. it's possible to measure the amount of water in a wall by drilling out samples, wighing them, drying them, then weighing to see how much less they weigh. Electrical damp meters are not reliable on masonry because it depends what the materials are. you might see something if you pry off the skirting boards (this needs doing anyway if they are damp and rotting).
you may find traces if you look at, or under, the bedroom floor.
If you can find the outdoor stopcock, you can test to see if there is an audible leak. it might be in the front pavement or back yard depending on local practice. It may bave been hidden under paving by some previous numbskull.
if you do the test using an indoor stopcock, it will only tell you if there is a leak after that stopcock.
It is possible that a leak from the bathroom above has got into the floor. this may take a year or more to dry out.