Feeling slightly confused by the methodology being applied by the seller of a house we would like to buy.
House needs a LOT of work. You couldn’t move into it in the current condition. Great location, huge amounts of potential etc etc. It has been on the market two months. We were the first people to see it and made an offer there and then. It was a cheeky offer but not an unjustifiable one based on other properties in the area. It was rejected as we expected.
After six weeks on the market we are the ONLY people to have offered. We really want it so raised our offer to 96% of the asking price. We are a full cash buyer from inheritance. The house is on for way more than it’s worth compared to other properties on the market in the same area so we would definitely paying more than it’s worth at that price.
Again, they have turned it down. Their rationale being that until viewings dry up then they’re not going to accept anything. Apparently the market is so buoyant they don’t need to. The house has had 74 viewings. And one offer (from us). So they just want to keep having viewings until there aren’t any more before even considering an offer.
It’s obviously totally down to them as to what they want to sell it for but I feel like they have totally wasted my time with their unrealistic expectations. I mean, it goes both ways? Why list your property if you will only sell for an unrealistic (and probably unachievable) price?
We are going to keep the offer on the table and hope in another few weeks they see sense but it’s so frustrating. FYI the agents are totally on our side and don’t understand why the vendors are going with a chain free cash offer at almost asking price after two months on the market.
Anyone else feel like they are dealing with bonkers sellers???