@Sheilablessus
Ok, Thank you all for the replies to me query. I am surprised that no one has been positive toward me.
No one has addressed the point that solicitors feel entitled to charge according to value of house. It isn't harder to work on a house that costs £500k than on one at £250k is it?
No ideas how many hours work is involved. That is a secret so that the cartel is maintained and extra profit ensured.
Saying you would not accept me on the other side of the transaction is blatantly unfair. Is it illegal?
One of the reasons I am considering this is because of delays currently in the system. Admittedly mainly on the buy side, and I am selling.
I buy properties as part of my job and I always use solicitors. I only pay £600 in legal fees which doesn’t vary according to the purchase price of the properties. It’s only the cost of some outlays that varies.
It’s £600 well spent.
You are wrong to think that there are no searches.
You are wrong to think that you will speed things up, as you will still be dependent on the others party’s solicitor.
I’d also not buy from someone who did not have legal representation . The fact that you think this might be illegal shows how little you understand of the law.
I don’t know how quickly you think you can do it yourself - my shortest transaction has been 4 weeks and I’ve never had a transactions take long than 3 months. And that was was when there were significant problems which took longer to resolve because of lockdown.
In one, the seller had made unauthorised alterations. In another there was a problem with the Land Registry documents. Both needed the seller’s solicitor to resolve.
In both cases my solicitor spent many hours dealing with it. But she only charged me £600 as it was a fixed fee.
They are the best value solicitors you will ever get.
If you think conveyancing is expensive you've clearly not been divorced
.