I just received a survey back which only had one urgent repair needed (something that was obvious on viewing anyway that we were well aware of and was reflected in our asking price). Nothing huge or structural like new roof or subsidence (no evidence of issues with either from the survey).
However, the survey also mentioned that although there is physical evidence of a chemical damp course injection, they cannot confirm if one has taken place and even so this does not tend to be the most effective way to damp proof a property of this age (1890s) however no damp was detected in the flat itself.
The survey then went on to detail the process and expense of having physical damp proofing put in place and now I’m not sure what to think. It sounds really expensive to correct if there is an issue but having said that there’s no evidence of damp in the property? Would this put you off?