Does anyone have any advice for me? We’ve just been to view a Victorian mid terrace and my partner loved it. The owner, who was there, told us that a substantial amount of the land out the back belonged to the property, including side access, a garage, a shed, and land behind where there was an old treehouse. This stretched across the back of at least one other house, which only had a small enclosed yard. I’ve just accessed the land registry title plan map though, and this definitely does not include all the extra land described as belonging to the house. The house was only added to the land registry last month, I assume in preparation for the sale. The owner was old, had been there for over 50 years. They are moving in with family. I’m guessing that the family, in supporting the owner to sell, have not even attempted to unpick which bits of land belong to whom, since agreements predate land registry records, and have instead just opted to “claim” the bit the house has clearest ownership of?
I’m much less interested in the house if the extra land is not included. Is it even worth pursuing? How can I find out who does own the land?