It's kind of complicated because it's a right to buy. It's also flats I'm talking about not houses, sorry should have said that at the start incase it makes a difference.
a neighbour of mine had her flat valued and then bought it and hers was valued at 75,000. She only has half the back garden, it's shared with the flat upstairs and at the front of her flat are parking spaces, so no land there that is hers alone.
Our flat was valued last week, exactly a year after hers, and they valued it at 90,000. What we don't know is if the guy who valued it assumed that all the backgarden is ours or took into consideration that we would only get half the back garden as well. Can't seem to find out either. We have gardens at the front of our flat but again don't know if we would get all of it or only half with the other half going to the flat upstairs.
I'm just finding it hard to believe that our flat, which is exactly the same at the one across the street, same size, same number of rooms etc, has jumped £15,000 in the space of a year. only slight difference is the parking spaces/land at the front.
Other flats in our street haven't sold recently but the one next door to us is up for sale at the moment(having been bought about 20 years ago) at over 100,000 but it has a new bathroom, kitchen, all the land at the front and back and a conservatory.
I'm just staggered that in the space of a year there has been a 17% price increase. I feel that if it's been valued with all the land included and then we only get half the land then the valuation is wrong and should be a bit lower.