We’re currently in the process of buying a 3 bed flat in london, we put in an offer and had it accepted for a freehold property. After a few weeks our lawyer contacted us and asked if we knew why the property was now a 999 year leasehold instead of the share of freehold we had been promised. This was complete news to us and when questioned the sellers solicitor was very aggressive with ours demanding we move forward. The estate agent had no idea that there had been a change either.
Turns out the seller shares the freehold with his siblings for the whole building and is now claiming he will transfer the freehold to us at a later date, once another flat in the building has sold. We offered to buy the entire freehold for the building but the sellers solicitor rejected that without even speaking to the seller. We then went to the estate agent who took a week to get in touch with the seller, who again on advice from their solicitor has rejected this proposition.
We have now gone back with a revised offer, with a reduced amount up front and a reserved amount that will transfer when we do get the freehold as we have repeatedly been told to “trust the seller” and that we will get the freehold at a later date. We went through the estate agent again with this proposal and he has now emailed us back saying the seller was talking to his lawyer about it. Our solicitor has emailed the sellers solicitor who has sent back a single line “why has there been a reduction in price”.
The solicitor has been rude a number of times in his replies, and basically refused to have any discussions around potential negotiation despite the fact that what we put in an offer for and what we are now looking to purchase are different.
The flat is great and the location works well for us, but are we just dealing with some con men and should we walk away?! There is no chain on either side so this really should have been a quick transaction!