I think there are 2 issues here:
- Whether stamp duty is a good tax overall - Almost everyone agrees that it only adds to friction in the market and more boost to the economy could be achieved without it by stimulating housing and other ancillary services. However, given the fiscal hole the government is in now I do not think if that will be deemed a viable choice at this point.
- Extension of the current deadline:
a. I think the SD holiday has served its intended purpose of stimulating the market (as reflected by almost 7% yearly increase in house prices, which is far more than the actual stamp duty saving of almost 15k). Looking back, one could question why would buyers prefer to pay almost 7% more to save 2-3%. The 7% is pocketed by asset rich homeowners who do not need immediate help in the battered economy. Plus Rishi Sunak will create one more cliff edge (six months down the line) if holiday were to be extended for all for few months.
b. I do not think it is anyone argument that with stamp duty prices will crash. With historical low interest rates, net immigration and severely restricted housing supply, hosing market will continue to climb up in mid to long term barring few corrections in the interim (say 5-6%) in a year but over time it will recover given the structural issues in the market as mentioned above.
c. In all likelihood, the prices will witness a slow decline / burn over the next 1 year followed by stagnation or so until economy fully recovers.
d. Personally speaking, I would be in favor of extending deadline for those buyers who are currently in the pipe to exchange before the deadline. Hopefully the market will come back to its senses after Mar-April (definitely not a crash) by a mild correction, which will most likely help buyers more. I would rather pay 2-3% stamp duty on a lesser priced house.
That said, this govt is notorious ofor making last minute announcements so we never know.