We’re in the process of getting a party wall agreement from our adjoining neighbour for an attic conversion and kitchen extension.
They chose to appoint their own party wall surveyor - 8 months before we had even served them notices... No issues with them appointing their own, as is their right.
For context, they have been difficult throughout this process. They’re a solicitor/barrister couple (lucky us) and very entitled - I’ve put her nose out before by saying no when she was trying to get me to do something she felt needed doing on the shared bin alley. They also put in a comment on our planning application for an extension on the opposite side of our property to them (which doesn’t form part of the party wall agreement). They were concerned about the impact of light on their property supposedly; this extension can in no way affect their light.
She was due with their second child last summer (when they thought we would start the build). Cue long emotional to me with a list of demands requests such as we had to agree to 2 hours of quiet time each day so the baby could sleep (can sort of understand this one), we must should put off the build until the September so they could enjoy their garden. We did not engage with this process and they were asked to direct all questions of this nature to our architect.
We’re now getting into the nitty gritty of the party wall which, thankfully, is all being sorted by the two surveyors (our architect is acting for our property). The architect has just informed me that they/their surveyor have tried to include a clause stipulating that we wouldn’t do ANY noisy works at all on the property between 13:00 and 14:30 to allow for nap time, not just no noisy works on the party wall itself.
Had our architect not picked this up would that have been legally binding despite it being outside the scope of the Party Wall Agreement?