In my head, when I call in someone to take care of a problem, I’m expecting it to be fixed, and not to have another problem to deal with. Basically, what my dad would have done if I’d called him, I suppose.
I’m not sure if I’m being unreasonable or not.
As an example, I was moving into a rented house several years ago, and there was a water stain on the ceiling from the upstairs bath. Landlord organised a plumber to investigate. I moved in a week later. The side of the bath had been removed and replaced to access the pipes, and a tile and piece of skirting board damaged. The trim along the bottom where the side and floor join was broken and left to one side.
So the problem with the pipe leak is fixed but any water splashes (which are fairly likely given it’s a bath shower with a curtain) are going to end up under the bath and damaging the ceiling.
It’s probably a small and simple job to sort out if you have a tool kit with a hammer, saw to cut trim to length, grout and time to go and buy tile, trim, plaster etc.
Is that an unreasonable state to leave the job in, or is that normal?
Another time a plumber installed a new radiator and left a gaping hole in the wall. The carpenter, knocked a chunk out of the wall replacing a skirting board. Then the painter who came next painted around them both. I didn’t actually find these until after they were all gone, but if I had would I have been unreasonable in expecting the plumber or carpenter to fix the holes they made? Was it unreasonable to expect the painter to fix them in the course of preparing the walls? Or should I have found a plasterer (or who?) to come in between?