Waiting to complete on house purchase in Jan, we know we want to extend the kitchen. The last few days we have been noodling over a couple of options. I would appreciate any thoughts or insights from those that have done similar on which might work better.
Current layout is typical 1930s semi detached, 2 reception rooms and small kitchen. We were originally thinking we might go out to the side, but now we're considering whether extending to the back might be better.
Attached pics show current layout, Options A (extend to side) and B (extend to back). There is a garage set to the back of the house in the garden. We were originally thinking we might knock it down but now thinking we might keep it, render the outside to make it less ugly and use it as a shed / storage (we will never use it as a proper garage for keeping car in). We definitely want to keep the 2 separate reception rooms rather than knocking kitchen diner type thing.
Option A feels like it is making use of 'dead space' out to the side of the house and won't require us to switch the reception rooms round. It also won't eat into the garden, however the garden is pretty big so we can stand to lose some for extending.
Option B might give us a more useful kitchen family space at the back and feels like a more logical flow? We would switch the reception rooms so the dining is off the kitchen, but the dining wouldn't get much natural light being in the middle with no windows. Though we could have doors with glass to let light in.
I think both have their merits. Obviously we need to factor cost in once we move and are able to get quotes.
So if anyone is able to decipher my not to scale sketches and would care to comments, please do so 