We recently went to see a an old mid 1950's house and it happens to be a leasehold house. Not freehold.
We have been told there is a small annual ground rent to pay of a few pounds, which is negligible and not an issue to us. No other charges.
The lease was 999years. So over 900 years left on it.
We've been told by some that it's technically as good as a freehold due to the length of the lease.
We ideally wanted a freehold but like the house so considering this leasehold property.
We wanted to check if everyone agrees that this is technically as good as a freehold? or do you see any other cons which you thnk we should be aware of?
Thanks.