Recently had HBR done on 1940s property. It says something like 'property is in reasonable condition if you are prepared to accept the cost and inconvenience of dealing with the various repair works reported. These deficiencies are quite common in houses of this age.'
But then goes on to list what feels like a million problems or potential problems. Do HBRs list literally everything that could go wrong or would they not mention it if it wasn't an issue?
E.g. I totally accept the ventilation and insulation isn't as good as it's an older house, but it then mentions things like 'Timber is liable to rot and beetle infestations are common in houses of this type.' - It sounds general, but is that a warning? Or the surveyor covering themselves? It's not saying there IS an infestation, but is it hinting it's likely? I don't know how serioiusly to take it all as it doesn't make for comforting reading and there are lots of potential issues like this mentioned.
I'm clear on the definite problems - a small amount of rising damp, a roof issue etc. and will go back to EA, but worrying a little about the above.
What's the general consensus with how these reports usually work, please?