If you wanted an extra bedroom and more space downstairs (including a downstairs loo and a kitchen big enough to eat in), which would you prioritise?
House is a 3-bed 30s semi (2 bedrooms and a box room, knocked through living/dining room and galley kitchen). Currently have 2 DCs (aged 4 and newborn). We have one bedroom, DC1 has the box room, and the other is a spare room. For various reasons, we’re keen to keep a spare room if possible.
A side return extension isn’t possible and none of the architects we’ve had found have been very keen on the idea of reconfiguring the back of the house to get a fourth bedroom out of a part double height extension.
We were originally going to do the ground floor extension to get a decent kitchen and downstairs loo, with a view to doing a loft conversion at a later stage, maybe 5 years down the line. We are now thinking it might be better to do the loft conversion first (also cheaper) to get the bedrooms that we need, and to do the ground floor extension at a later stage.
No plans to move - we see this as a long-term home. Cost-wise, the loft conversion is cheaper and costs more predictable. We could stretch to the ground floor extension but it would cost more and I suspect there are more likely to be hidden costs; the building work would also be more disruptive, I think.
Which would you do first and why? Which is more useful with children under ten, living space and an eat-in kitchen, or sufficient bedrooms?