Note sure if anyone knows the law relating to my current dilemma.
Boring story but nutshell is that my tenant's contract ends at the end of July. However they have already moved out but some of their belongings remain in the property. I asked my tenants if I could take a gardener in to do some work to the garden (as it has not been maintained particularly well) and they agreed. I didn't elaborate on what the work was and they didn't ask.
They happened to stop by when the job was halfway through (it was a two day job). I had an email saying their possessions were covered in dust etc. and they weren't happy saying they were not aware how big the job was and how they would never have allowed it if they had known (sanding the wooden chairs and trellis, repainting, repointing the paving stones and tending to the foliage)
As the tenants now won't allow me to enter the property so can't inspect it but my gardener assures me that the property was left in the same state as it was when he started, ie he cleaned up everything when he finished the job, but during the job, well the gardener says there was no dust anyway. I have used him before and he is extremely trustworthy.
Tenants are trying to argue that I should pay him the sum of approx 50% of the months rent to cover "damage".
I genuinely don't feel like I did anything wrong so uninclined to pay. I feel like he is chancing his arm. I consider myself to be a good landlord and always fix any problem promptly.
What would you do? Do you think I am in the wrong?