For context, we're FTB and haven't moved yet but I'm already planning and costing all the refurb in my head!
The bathroom in the new place is pretty old and grotty. We'll want to redo the entire thing: new suite, half-tiled walls, and vinyl flooring.
My mum, who lives on the opposite side of the country, is an absolute whiz with DIY and has offered help with absolutely all of this, so we can save a lot of money on labour - except the plumbing part of removing & reinstalling the suite... so we'll have to get a plumber in for that. She's suggested the following:
- Mum comes up to help us remove all wall tiles and floor vinyl
- We pay a plumber to remove existing suite & install new suite
- Mum comes up again to re-tile (and plaster if necessary) the walls and lay the new vinyl.
I was concerned about un-waterproofed walls, but we can take very careful baths for a week or two until the walls are re-tiled. I have young siblings, so mum can't come up and stay for several days while the plumber is here - it has to be split between two trips. And we'll only have one toilet, so the suite needs to be removed and fitted within one day.
My question is, really, is it ok to fit the vinyl flooring after the new suite has been put in (assuming there's decent floorboards or similar underneath the current vinyl)? My mum reckons it's fine, and the bathroom in our current flat has been done the same way, but some googling suggests that flooring should be done first. Does it matter? Is it just a matter of aesthetics with the finished product or is there a real problem with this plan?
Hopefully my post all makes sense... let me know if I've not explained anything properly!