Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Property/DIY

Join our Property forum for renovation, DIY, and house selling advice.

Can I have my home withdrawn from a conservation area?

9 replies

NotOnTheBench · 19/10/2018 15:01

Bought our house in 1985 and the area became a conservation area in 2007-ish. I have just read the draft appraisal again [which I don't recall ever having sight of prior to the area being designated].

There is no mention of our property, it isn't Victorian, like the rest of the area. It's on the very edge of the delineation. Our property is of no architectural or special significance.

We didn't require planning permission to replace our windows - which we did replace as pvc sash windows, to be in general keeping with the area; although we did have to apply for permission to fell a tree which was protected, but was dead and dropping chunks of bark on to a public highway, so we were permitted to take it down.

Now that we are years down the line and in a position to consider an extension or solar panels, or to convert our double garage into a bedsit for our kids, we are coming up against the fact that we are in a conservation area so can't do any development. I asked about solar panels, as our house faces south, but was told we could only put panels on the rear, north facing roof so as not to detract from the public facing look of the house. We have a brick wall and trees across the front, so what you can see from the road is minimal and there isn't a pretty Victorian house to look at anyway.

Does anyone know if we can ask to be withdrawn from the conservation area for the above reasons? Or are we trapped with no alternative but to move house?

OP posts:
AnalyticalChick · 19/10/2018 15:35

Simple answer: no.

LIZS · 19/10/2018 15:39

I don't think so but that in itself does not stop development as long as they meet the criteria.

wowfudge · 19/10/2018 15:39

You can ask - as far as I'm aware there's no law against that.

AnalyticalChick · 19/10/2018 15:54

CAs have strict boundaries, and you either falls inside or outside those boundaries. They covers an area, not individual properties, regardless of what is in the boundaries. I know of one CA that has a 60's council estate in it. If the council made an exception for you, it would have to make an exception for anyone else who wanted their house removed because it the CA was inconvenient. The CA would end up full of holes! It just ain't going to happen, so I wouldn't get up any hopes that it might be possible.

Seeline · 19/10/2018 15:54

Councils carry out reviews of CA boundaries periodically. Speak to the conservation officer to see if one is due. That would be the time to submit an argument to get your house removed if it is literally on the boundary. They won't cut a hole in the middle of the CA.
But you should still be able to carry out works. It might take a bit longer, but changes are still possible.

Lucisky · 19/10/2018 15:57

I can't see how it would stop any development you wanted?
We live in a conservation area and we extended. It just has to be in keeping with the surrounding area and houses. There were no problems with pp.
It would be a very short sighted council that put a stop on all development. There are thousands of conservation areas in the country. If no one was allowed to do anything to improve their property there would be uproar.

NotOnTheBench · 17/11/2018 10:38

Seeline: found out from local councillors that there is indeed a review under way as we speak (though we as residents knew nothing about it). I've spoken to a councillor who has said she will find out if principles allow any change to our status.

OP posts:
NotOnTheBench · 17/11/2018 10:40

Spotted a typo in my OP! House was built in 1985m we bought in 1995, before it became a CA

OP posts:
minipie · 17/11/2018 14:09

There are plenty of conservation areas around which include a few modern properties. Bomb infills for example. They are still covered by the conservation area restrictions because it would still detract from the character of the conservation area if that modern house did something unattractive or out of keeping to its frontage (eg solar panels, metal cladding, etc). It’s not about whether your particular house is Victorian or special, it’s about whether it’s part of an area deemed worthy of protection.

The conservation area restrictions generally only apply to the front facade and roof of the house. They aren’t going to stop you building an extension at the back. I’d have thought converting the garage should be fine too.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page