After a good search I know this has been asked so many times! But hoping to get more insight and whether more specifics may give me a better idea of what people would do!
As title says, we are stuck on a decision of location v house.
The decision is stay in current location and find a house (yet to come up! But occasionally do) that will be a smaller, likely 1400-1600 sq ft Georgian/Victorian terrace, probably only 3 bedrooms but could be lucky to have a small 4th, no parking and small garden but we adore the location, we've lived here 10 years and are v happy, love being able to walk around this area, nice shops, cafes, restaurants. Outstanding primary school in catchment, secondary school not an issue. Would be very top of our budget, no room probably to do any serious works initially.
OR
we have an offer accepted on a semi in an area only 1.7 miles away, the vendor has been messing us around a little and dragging it out for so long we're now unsure of our decision but now need to make a choice by tomorrow morning!
Area is OK, it's still considered a good area but less lively, less nice shops and restaurants but some nice cafes, quick walk to a nice park, "good" primary school. House is well under budget and we could do a nice extension out the back and a loft conversion and have 5 good sized bedrooms (family all live far away and would be nice to have this, currently in 2 bed flat no one can stay at!!) parking and a garage, bigger garden but not HUGE, closer to a main Rd.
We have two young dc's yet to start school and a dog.
I feel like I'd rather have the location but although dh feels the same about the location he'd rather have the bigger house, which I of course understand, but my day to day life v much consists of walking around our current area quite a bit which I love!
Opinions?! Thank you!