I have had an offer accepted on a house. The property has a converted cellar (study, utility room and toilet). When we viewed the property, the agent said the vendor had building regulations for the conversion. We have since found out that it does not have building regulations. I didn't think it did as its a small terrace and it was a very narrow stairwell without proper fire doors. That being said, it was converted in 2010 and there was no issues with damp etc. The house was in a good condition overall. There was also a window in the cellar which could potentially be used as emergency exit from the house.
My question is...is it common for a converted cellar not to have building regulations? Not many houses on the street have converted their cellars - they are small terraces though so I doubt full building regulations could even be met?
We are first time buyers. Will our lender have a problem with no building regulations for the cellar? This is a question we are going to ask our solicitor ASAP. I've heard we may have to get an indemnity policy for this?
A same sized house on the street has recently sold for £281,000. It was really nice internally and had open plan kitchen/diner, but the cellar was not converted. We have offered £285,000. We thought we were getting a good deal. Our house is in good condition, no open plan kitchen/diner, but we have good cellar space for a study and separate utility room (adding about 20 sq m of carpeted space).
Would you run a mile for not having building regs?
Any info anyone has would be really useful.