Hi All,
My wife and I are looking to buy our first house in London. We have got a deposit of £70k and hence are looking for properties in range of £650-700K with 3-4 bedrooms and large open plan kitchen and living area. We have selected two properties in zone 4 and 5 with good schools and travel connections, but we are very confused about which one to go for.
Property 1: A 4 bedroom recently refurbished detached bungalow for £650 with all the needs which we have but in zone 5-6 (120 sq.m.)
Property 2: A 2/3 bedroom detached bungalow in zone 4 for £450k but needs full refurbishment and extension in zone 4 (100 sq. m).
In order to make it our dream house we would need to do:
- Add glass french door from living to garden (£3000)
- New bathroom (£6000)
- New flooring (£2500)
- New internal doors (£500)
- New Kitchen (including appliances and a large platform) (£25000)
- New main door (£500)
- New toilet (£2000)
- New bay window (£500)
- Driveway (£500)
10. Repainting and replastering (£2000)
11. Rewiring and replumbing (£2000)
12. Single story extension (7m X5m) (£40000)
13. Solar panels (£5000)
14. Underfloor heating (£5000)
15. Removal of a load bearing wall to make it open plan (£1500)
In total, even if we add 10-15% contingency cost it would come down to £100,000 on top of the asking price of £450k
We are confused with:
- What would be a better option to buy given that we have no experience and this would be our first property?
- If we go with option 2 then how shall we finance this refurbishment given that we have only have £70k available and would need to pay for initial deposit as well?
- Are our expectation of refurbishment cost more or less correct?
I know that there are a lot of queries in this single post but we are really confused and would appreciate any help/advise/suggestions on this. Thnks in advance :)