We made an offer on a house yesterday and took the agent’s advice to make it “best and final”, rather than start lower then increase to our max number. The EA said he knows how the vendors think etc.
So we made our best and final offer (5% below asking price), which got rejected within about 3 minutes by the vendor. Apparently they would accept 2% below asking price.
Felt a bit sad, but confident that it wasn’t worth more than we put forward, so we’d keep viewing other places. Yesterday evening the EA’s boss called us to ask about us increasing our offer...he tried a few different ways of making it sound like a good idea to go higher. I didn’t budge though.
I’m not sure what they didn’t understand about it being “best and final”. We have the higher amount available, but I need that in cash to do work inside the house.
I think the issue is that the vendor paid far too much for the house 6 years ago, so isn’t making a profit really. They’ve been on the market since January (they were on the market last year at a much higher price, but pulled it offer and remarketed after Christmas) and had a buyer in March for 2% below asking price, but that buyer pulled out.
We’re chain free, mostly cash (so no potential issue with a low mortgage valuation) and want to complete in 6-8 weeks (they’re moving to their house overseas). Surely that’s worth something to a vendor?
What kind of game is the EA playing? Thinking ahead to our next offer on another house, do you think is it best to make a lower offer and work up?