Its sad to see that all landlords are regarded as scum. Not everyone owns more than 1 property for profit. We own 2 houses. We live in 1, the other is tenanted. As it stands, the tenants are low income, we have known them years as they lived in the house before DP bought it and then they moved next door when their then landlord opted to sell. When DP and I got together we bought our now property, and rented it out to them way below the going rate (zone 2/3east London). We wanted a fresh start (he owned with his ex), they were being forced to move and we wanted good long term tenants - we could afford the deficit on the mortgage for them to live there.
We decided to keep the property when we bought as DP is self employed and it was a 'pension pot'. It was never to 'flip' or make a quick profit from rent. We also kept the property because it's an excellent location so any future children will, should this be the city they choose to do so, have a good base to live and work.
A few years ago MIL who lives alone, asked if she could occupy this property eventually. We started this process last year and the future is bleak for us on this front with mortgages on BTL. We will, if we really have to, sell the property.... that affects more than just us. Our low income tenants would need to move, which ultimately means they are moving out of an area they've lived in 10 years and uprooting their children from school and friends. MIL will be elsewhere where we can afford to house her.
The changes to the rental market affect all involved, and the negatives are not all on the landlords side of the fence.
If nothing else, I'm glad it will slow down greedy oversea buyers and individuals creating a monopoly on 10's of properties. But I'm incredibly sad for all of those who are 'accidental landlords' with 1 extra property and the tenants who's futures will suffer because of all this.
No real point to this other than trying to show that not everyone is the greedy landlord MN seems to think they are.