Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Property/DIY

Join our Property forum for renovation, DIY, and house selling advice.

Future Development Impacts on Property Value Question

7 replies

rosshull · 22/04/2018 16:32

Hi,

We've found a house that basically ticks basically all the boxes for us, well except for two! I really can't make up my mind on and would really appreciate your thoughts! My concerns are purely around protecting investment value as much as possible.

  1. It's a rural house at the very end of a village, with fields opposite. While this is great in theory, one of the fields not-quite opposite is up for sale for residential development and realistically the other will probably sell within a few years for more houses. I don't think this really bothers us, but I need to make a call on if it could reduce the house value, lets say an extra 30 houses popped up? I accept that prices might fall during before/development, but once it's all done? Should this be a sign to walk away or should I not try and predict the future :)?
  1. It's on a main road with 30 speed limit. I've ummed and arred about this but the house is double glazed and we've not heard much noise during peak times and confident we would get used to traffic noise to some extent. I think the house is probably priced with this in mind.

I know there's no right answer here! But if the house is lovely inside would you let the above two points put you off?

OP posts:
Pradaqueen · 22/04/2018 19:10

Honestly? I’d walk away. I’ve lived on a main road with a 30mph limit and it drive me insane. It isn’t just the traffic noice, it’s lorries/buses lack of parking and the worry about kids and dog gs getting out of the property if the postman leaves the gate open. Regarding the development, if the vendor is determined, it will happen and then you may have 3 years of development traffic/noise/dust to contend with.

If you are really set on it, maybe offer a price that reflects the value it has once the development is underway? The vendor will have the same issue with all buyers.

JT05 · 22/04/2018 19:16

I’d also walk away. Two years ago we looked at a house with a fab farmland view across a field that was next to it.
Now the builders have just started on that field and no doubt will soon be building on the other fields.

LIZS · 22/04/2018 19:24

Either one of those would make me reconsider, let alone both. We live on a 30mph main road, fine most of the time except for peak times(school run and commute), emergency services, hgvs... If there are problems on surrounding motorway/A roads traffic soon builds up. It is not only noise but air pollution and dust. Given the way government policy is gong one field, if not both, is likely to be built upon.

sausagedogsmakechipolatas · 22/04/2018 19:25

I live on a main road with a 30mph limit. My car and front windows are constantly filthy, it’s noisy at peak times and cars speed down the road far faster than the limit.

With the development - and resulting disruption, dust and noise that comes with it? It would be a no from me.

Mybabystolemysanity · 22/04/2018 19:42

I have a slightly different take on this. We have a new build bungalow in a county town in Scotland. It's four years old and we're selling it now for 20% more than we bought it for because the developer has a new site in the same town to build another 200 houses, but not for another two years. We're getting out while we can because we anticipate difficulty selling when similar new homes go up.

On the other hand, 10 miles down the road in a similar sized town, there are people selling four year old houses for 20% less than they paid because they paid far too much to the developer. The estate still isn't finished and we can't afford to buy on it.

I think you need to know the size and specifications of the new houses, what the price will be and see how it compares to what you're thinking of buying. It may be that there's no comparison and what you're buying won't in all honesty be compromised because it's bigger, more private, has more garden, basically the same EPC, number of bathrooms and will still be cheaper than the new builds and be saleable with a profit for you if you need to move. If that's the case and you like everything else about it and can cope with the road, go for it but only offer what you feel it's worth to you and be prepared to move on if you can't get it.

We are going to a very large, old house on a main road, rural with views of fields. It has more rooms, more space and more privacy than an equivalently priced new build, but it's been cared for. Compromise will be road noise to get used to and limited parking. Not planning ever to move again, but if we did, we're looking to pay £30k less than it's valuation because they've had it on more than a year and dropped the price.

Piffpaffpoff · 22/04/2018 19:53

The other thing that would worry me about possible development (and I speak from bitter experience) is the impact on local amenities such as schools etc. We moved to be close to a good school but neighboursnow can’t get their kids into theat school now due to a new development being slightly closer and taking up the places.

BettyBooJustDoinTheDoo · 22/04/2018 22:08

Trouble is if you are buying any house which has a view onto fields or countryside, even if there are no plans now, there is always the very strong likelihood that they will be built on with government planning policy the way it is. If it’s a worry to you then probably best to find a house that does not have a view onto fields etc so you will then generally know what you are getting.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page