We've had a quote of £20,000 labour-only to renovate a hallway and stairwell.
The house is a three-storey 1880s Victorian terrace in south London. We've been living here since May last year. It's not a wreck, but it is tatty in places, especially the stairwell, which has bumpy, shiny magnolia walls, an unpleasant murky-green carpet, and doors that don't fit properly.
The decorator subcontracts the carpentry, etc to a team of people. We got a recommendation to use him from my parents-in-law, as he'd done work on their house and others in their street. He did some work last year repainting, retiling and renovating our conservatory, which was falling down, painting our back room and restoring some sash windows.
When we queried why it was so expensive, he said it was because I wanted to keep the original Victorian door frames rather than throwing them in a skip, wanted to repair the doors (again, rather than skipping them and buying new ones), the bannisters needed the paint stripping, which is a time-consuming job, and hanging patterned wallpaper in a stairwell would cost thousands.
He couldn't give us a breakdown for individual bits of the project, but agreed that replastering would only cost about £4,000 to £6,000. We can see and hear that the plaster has blown in places so we expected this to be an expensive job. He said we couldn't hang wallpaper on the existing walls and didn't seem interested in taking on the project if he couldn't mess about renovating the bannisters (which we suggested ignoring to cut costs).
To me, the quote seems absurd. A whole new back extension with a luxury finish is only £50k - at least according to the interiors magazines I read.
Are we underestimating the cost of this project? In general, his business model hasn't worked for us as I work from home and prefer to choose my own suppliers for tiles, paint, etc.