Myself DH and 2 year old DD live in a new build two bed apartment which DH bought about 5 years ago. It's a ten minute walk to where we both work, shops and parks. The local primary school which is just opposite work is one of the best in the area.
It's lovely modern flat with an amazing sea view and all the amenities are quite new as well. The downside is it's getting really cramped with the three of us as it has no storage space or a garden for DD to play in etc.
We've looked at houses in the surrounding area and found a three bed detached with plenty of storage and a wee garden built in the 40s. The interior, kitchen bathrooms are quite old fashioned as is the layout of the house. But the location is excellent as it's even closer to work and there a nursery for DD within walking distance as well. We've made a offer which has been accepted.
All the other more modern nicer houses with bigger gardens we've seen are at least a 30 minutes drive away.
I think location is important as I'm returning to work soon and can do without the stress of driving and nursery drop off pick up in the morning. However we will have to spend ££ on upgrading the house kitchen fittings wardrobes etc. The new builds which we've seen have all these already which would be convenient.
I suppose location is important although we don't love the house? What have your experiences been like? Or is it an obvious decision??
DH however is uncertain about lea