I bought a leasehold Flat last July. It’s in a large Victorian house with a more modern annex attached. There are 3 flats in the old part (including mine) and 5 in the modern part. Under the terms of the lease any repairs/ maintenance costs are split between 8 of us.
Some of the residents of the modern building are unhappy about this as they think that the Victorian building will require more maintenance and therefore think they shouldn’t have to pay for that. While I understand their point my argument is that they bought their properties having read the lease so are bound by it. My understanding was that with only 8 flats it would require us all to agree to any changes in the lease. So that was that and it all seemed to die down.
Recently however new neighbours have bought another of the Victorian flats and their solicitor has unearthed a document which proves that 17 years ago the freehold was signed over to the management company of the building, of which the 8 of us are shareholders. Now the main instigator from the modern annex is claiming this means that they can change the lease and force the changes they want.
Is this true? Any property law experts out there who can advise?