We want to replace our family bathroom as it’s more than a bit jaded and really doesn’t work for our family. It currently has no shower at all (not even a hand-held shower head attached to the taps) and, with two rapidly growing tweens in the house, this is a necessity for us! So we were planning on having a shower bath and over-bath shower installed.
We have a combi-boiler and so had assumed that we should get an electric shower because when I use the (equally jaded but going to have to last a bit longer!) shower in our en-suite, I frequently end up with a very hot/cold shower, or no water pressure, because someone else flushes a loo or turns on a tap.
(Unfortunately, sharing our en-suite shower with the kids doesn’t work because DH works nights and so is usually asleep during the day and early evening, when the kids want to shower).
We’ve had 4 companies round to quote, and they are split 50:50 on whether we should pay the extra £300 for an electric shower, or not. Two have firmly said ‘it’s not worth it, install a thermostatic shower instead’ but I’m not sure whether this just means they can’t be bothered with the extra hassle of fitting it!
Surely having an electric shower in the main bathroom would be a big benefit? As I understand it, a thermostatic shower would help 'smooth out' sudden changes in water temperature but wouldn't help with drops in pressure. What am I missing?!