We are planning on replacing our kitchen this year and we are in a real dilemma over whether to keep the kitchen separate or knock through to the dining room.
Downstairs we have a lounge, family room, separate dining room, kitchen (which is a good size and I have a table in there that can seat 6 people) we also have a utility room.
This is my dilemma - my DC and DH do not want to knock through and have one big kitchen diner. They like the separate dining room. DH probably more so because of the actual cost of knocking through and disruption. I think there are pros and cons to both.
If I keep the set up the same, I would not have a central island in the new kitchen with a breakfast bar coming off it, I would keep a stand alone table. My thinking is that if/when we sold the house it would give new house owners options to have the kitchen as the main eating area and use the dining room as a playroom/study etc. If we knock through I would have a central island with a breakfast bar, move and slightly extend the utility room and we would use the dining room daily (at the moment it is used couple of times a week). Now, as I am typing I am thinking this is a no brainer and we need to knock through.
BUT DC and DH say, when we are eating you've got all the mess from the kitchen there, food smells will be worse, noise from the kitchen, and they love the dining room. All my friends say knock through. I am so confused.
What do you all think and am I being really silly to even consider not knocking through?
Thank you