We are buying a big 6 bed Victorian property in a conservation area. It's beautiful with lots of original features but hasn't been well looked after and needs "sympathetic updating" as the estate agent tactfully said.
I reckon a full or partial rewire, replumb, a fair bit of replastering (lime plaster), repair/replace Windows, possibly new boiler/radiators, repointing, partitioning loft, new bathrooms and kitchen plus a side extension to the kitchen to join it up to the dining room. Current kitchen is currently a bit dark and poky.
It would be hell on earth to try and live there so we are planning on completing in Jan and keeping our current house which sees aim to put on the market in spring and move into the new house in summer when hopefully the worst of the works are done, even if decorating bit isn't.
Time is fairly critical as any longer than 6 months or so and the large mortgage payments will start to eat into the renovation budget.
I'm semi clued up on construction projects as I'm a solicitor who deals with construction defect claims so I've got a reasonable idea if what things cost and what's involved BUT this is very far from ever having handled such a project myself. We both work full time, commute and have two children aged 12 and 3.
I'm already talking to architects for the extension design so we can get ahead with planning permission before we complete - might be a but fiddly because of Conservation area.
Have done loads if research and a point that keeps cropping up is (particularly if you're inexperienced and don't have lots of time to commit) getting an independent project manager to manage the build, postings etc to keep it within budget and on time. However other people say a decent builder should be able to PM.
My husband thinks maybe an independent PM is too much given my professional experience and that we will have an architect involved. But I'm finding it overwhelming and incredibly time consuming already.
Is an independent PM a good idea ... or not?