I'm hoping one of you Mumsnetters might be an architect, or have used architects, and could give a bit of feedback about what I should expect from the architect that I've employed (I appreciate professional discretion and all, but I don't know if I've got the right expectations because I can be a bit of a control freak at times ).
We are wanting to have an extension built and had rather lofty ideas which we discussed with the architect we chose and then decided we had to scale back a big bit when we talked to them about the cost. The architect came back to survey the property, we talked about what we weren't going to do (to knock down and rebuild or convert a bit of the property) and I tried to write a comprehensive list of requirements at that point, and sent it with a couple of drawings I'd created in Sketchup as the kind of idea of what we wanted. The first draft came back, was in the wrong names (Mr and Mrs 9GreenBottles as opposed to Ms 9GreenBottles and Mr X - and that was after I'd corrected them previously about Mr X's first name on a previous email and made sure that we both signed the contract) and it included a conversion of the room we had said was out of scope so we asked for a further draft.
I'd also given some feedback about specific sizes of rooms, and positioning of doors linking the existing building to the new extension. Now the second draft has come back with smaller rooms and made a corridor to link the doors where I had said I hadn't wanted one (we needed a route in and a route out of an existing room and I had said I wanted the two doors to face one another so that a future buyer could put in a stud wall if they wanted to convert the rooms into bedrooms).
Can anybody tell me if this is normal architects artistic licence, or inattention to detail, and how many times is normal/acceptable to send a draft back and say "can you move that please?"