We're about to put our flat on the market and have had three estate agents round to value it. I'm probably overthinking things here but can't decide who to go with. Which one of these would you pick? All three came back with more or less the same expected sale price, all would hold an open house before inviting offers. It's not a difficult flat to sell.
Agent 1. National chain. Guy who came round was very pleasant. Standard offer system (as in, people offer, agent may ask whether they can up their offer). Fee 1% + VAT.
Agent 2. Local agency. Good reputation. Very good photos. Again, I actually liked the agent - very straightforward. Was very clear that all buyers would be vetted in advance so they know they are in a position to proceed. Standard offers system. Fee 1.5% + VAT.
Agent 3. Local agency. Good reputation & photos. Very good at marketing - really stand out. But the guy who came round set my teeth on edge - a bit too smooth, a bit too try-hard. They use a sealed bids system, which I have reservations about. Fee 1% + VAT.
Prior to getting people round, I thought we'd be going with agent 3, as their marketing really stands out. But now I'm torn as I'm not sure about sealed bids - I would find that really stressful as a buyer and would be annoyed to be pipped by £500, say. Am wondering about agent 2 if they can match the 1% fee.
So how did you pick your estate agent? And were they worth it? Did you negotiate on the fee?