Hello... first post here so please bear with me!
I'm in the process of buying my first house.
It's over 100 years old. We have done all the searches and everything is ok.
However, in the survey, it said 'sub floor ventiliation is inadequate.' I called the surveyor to discuss this and he said it was standard wording and that as far as he could tell everything was ok, but he couldn't say for sure because he hadn't actually seen the sub floor.
So my next idea was to get a survey on the timbers. This is a problem because the floor would need taking up. If I pushed it, the vendors would probably let me do this, but it will add on more time to the transaction and my tenancy runs out next week so as it is I will be couch surfing for the last few week! (cant extend my tenancy).
Instead I have asked my solicitor to ask the sellers if they have had any problems with wet or dry rot in the property. The sellers solicitor's response was: 'there was no work done when the sellers moved in and none evident since.'
I also asked the estate agent to ask the seller a while ago if they had ever had problems with any rot and they said no.
I feel the seller's solicitor's answer was vague, but i tend to worry generally so maybe im just reading too much into it?
Any advice would be appreciated!