Hiya,
We've had an offer accepted on a property we're looking to buy. It's a 1930s build (in London/SE) with a significant first and second floor extension inc partial re-wiring undertaken in 1996, plus another smaller extension made in 2012.
The house is detached and looks in good order (so visible cracks, warping etc). We're at the stage of deciding whether we want to go for a full structural survey (v £££!) or a mid-range home condition or homebuyers report.
If money were no object I would go for the full structural (I would rather know of any issues lurking) but our mortgage advisor seems to be encouraging us to go down the mid-tier route (citing that the extensions were done 20years ago at most and that he has checked the council planning sites etc to see that all relevant permissions were obtained).
Am I being overly cautious? What would you wise MNetters recommend?