A beautiful house has just come up on the market on our road. It's about 50% bigger than ours, with beautiful big elegant spaces and stunning period features. However, it's got a very small garden, whereas our house has 0.4 acres.
We are planning on extending ours - we have planning permission but struggling to find a good, available, affordable builder. After extending it would still be significantly smaller, less well laid out, less elegant. Our house is quirky and extended in various ways as it is, so extending is not very cost-effective. On the other hand, neither are stamp duty and estate agents! And obviously we would have the big garden.
The other house would probably cost a little more than our extending our house, but possibly not that much more - it's hard to know exactly what this would go for and what ours would fetch.
DH is clearly not interested at all. He thinks we shouldn't give up the garden. But I'm not so sure. What do we actually use the garden for, apart from to look at (and maintain!). There is still a quiet, attractive, private space to sit in. In fact, there is even a swimming pool, even though the garden is no way big enough! Children are early years of secondary now, so getting past the playing outside stage. DS can always kick a ball at the nearby park where there is more space than our garden. But what about the grandchildren...? (quite serious - we intend to live in this area for ever)
This is one time when location isn't an issue since it is identical, but the houses are anything but!
Sooooo - would you considering trading down garden to trade up house? Have you ever chosen house over garden? How did it work out? Interestingly, my parents did. I had basically left home by then, but had a much younger sister at home.
I think I'm going to have to have a look anyway. Then I'll know whether I really love it or not.