I tried to sell last year in London, I am not a fan of estate agents but suffered them gladly rather than going out of my way to be nice to them. My home is in a great location/catchment, big, spacious Victorian, reasonably clean, some original features large garden (rare in our part of zone 3). During the few weeks I had it on, I found the agents to be really insipid and actually critical of my house just because they could not sell it. The sorts of reasons they were coming up with were along the lines of 'One of your bedrooms isn't a double, buyers don't like large gardens bc gardening is a hassle, there is a bit of skirting missing there around 5cm, one room doesn't have a ceiling rose ; buyers like original features absolutely everywhere, not just in half of the house.....etc etc. I was really sad about all of this and even dropped the price in response but it made no difference and I took it off within weeks. Now, I am feeling bad bc I wanted to move but never did, I keep an eye on what they have sold and how much they advertize those houses for and as far as I can see, there is nothing great about those houses. All I can say for sure is that the descriptions and photography is better and those houses do take longer to sell than the time I had mine on for. I guess I would like some advice re trying again. Do you think Feb is a good time to remarket or should I wait until after the elections? Should I go back with a local agent (same/different) or try an internet agent (if so, which one) purely to be able to market at a lower price thereby passing on the cost saving? As I said, this is one of the most popular parts of London and it is embarrassing and baffling as to why this happened even though the market had begun to quieten down at that stage.