DH and I love to go to London for concerts, theatre, etc but hotel rooms for our long weekends feel like throwing money away. We are thinking about purchasing a small flat in London that we could let out most of the time, but use ourselves when it isn't occupied. Is this a reasonable good idea?
We are considering buying a studio flat in somewhere in zones 2 or 3. Our budget would be small - about 210k but this is just for a pied a terre rather than a place to live permanently. Rightmove searches seem to indicate there are some places available in this price range.
We would be able to pay the mortgage on this flat plus the mortgage on our own home plus council tax on both without much difficulty and without having to rent the London flat out. Our jobs are stable. However we would prefer to let the London flat out on a short term basis up to about a month at a time via an agency. We would hope he revenues from this would make up 50-75% of the mortgage payments but if they didn't we could still manage. We would also have some funds set aside for repairs, etc.
The goal would be to eventually own the studio in London mortgage free and we could stay there as much as we like when retired. However we've never rented out any property before and have never owned more than our own home. I'm wondering whether this plan is viable at all and whether I'm overlooking anything? Thank you.